The Chinese University of Hong Kong Department of History Department of History
Contact Us

HIST3140 Intellectual Landscape of the Middle Periods of China

Semester 2 (2025-2026)

Lecture TimeTuesday, 14:30-16:15

VenueRoom 306, Lee Shau Kee Building (LSK 306)

LanguagePutonghua

Lecturer CHEUNG Hiu Yu (39435489 / hycheung@cuhk.edu.hk)

Teaching Assistant CHEN Junlin (chen-junlin@link.cuhk.edu.hk)

Course Description

八世紀下半葉以來,中國社會經歷了一個思想大變遷的時代。從中原王朝的視角出發,晚唐至明初的這一段時期在中國思想史上是為一大分水嶺。通過考察、梳理和分析八至十四世紀中國的一些文化和思想特徵,本課程希望引導同學走入中古時代的思想世界。《呂氏春秋》〈察今〉篇有所謂「古今一也,人與我同」的說法。以今察古,我們力求理解古人所思所想,進而認識現代思想史研究的根本取向和價值所在。

Syllabus

課程大綱 (暫定):
第一講: 思想史研究的範圍與習慣
第二講: 平蕪盡處—安史之亂前後的思想世界與歷史背景
第三講: 雲在青天—中、晚唐思想中的禪理
第四講: 明體達用—北宋前期的學術風氣
第五講: 唯新為大—熙豐新學之理想與追求
第六講: 以道為尊—兩宋道學之興起與發展:北宋篇
第七講: 心性之辯—兩宋道學之興起與發展:南宋篇
第八講: 以衍其傳-承載思想的物質條件
第九講: 憂憟廟堂—思想的政治與政治的思想
第十講: 鴻漸於陸—思想史中的社會理念與實踐
第十一講: 復性為宗—明初思想世界之基本宗旨
第十二講: 知行合一—陽明學的萌發與展開
第十三講: 代結語—中國近代思維的中古根源

Assessment & Assignments

課程評核及導修要求:
1. 平時課堂表現及討論 10%
2. 學期論文開題報告 10%
3. 學期論文 50%
4. 導修 30%

學期論文佔本課程評分50%, 字數以5000-7000字左右為佳。上限不得超過10000字, 否則可能會被酌情扣分。
導修課程共四次。四次導修均需出席。無故缺席者將喪失該次導修全部分數。
四次導修其中三次為思想辯析,三次評論共佔總分30%。
同學每次導修分為兩組,針對導修關鍵問題互相辯論。三次導修每次均須提交500字簡短報告一份。報告除簡單交代基本立場和觀點外,亦可以點列形式 (POINT-FORM)列出所使用的主要論據(論據引用部份不計入字數)。
報告需於導修課前四日交到老師和助教手中。
導修課上,同學除報告本身立場和論點外,亦須針對其他同學的報告提出批評意見或補充。
最後一節導修課為學期論文開題報告及討論會。開題報告佔總分10%。同學最遲須於導修課前三日把論文題目和基本大綱傳給老師。
評論報告和學期論文題目均需如期繳交。遲交者一天扣分3%; 學期論文遲交者一天扣分10%。

Others

課程目標:
(一) 思想史的意義
(二) 中國中古思想史的基本概念
(三) 作為社會基礎的思想世界
(四) 中國近現代思想的中古淵源

Honesty in Academic Work

Attention is drawn to University policy and regulations on honesty in academic work, and to the disciplinary guidelines and procedures applicable to breaches of such policy and regulations. Details may be found at http://www.cuhk.edu.hk/policy/academichonesty/.

With each assignment, students will be required to submit a signed declaration that they are aware of these policies, regulations, guidelines and procedures.

  • In the case of group projects, all members of the group should be asked to sign the declaration, each of whom is responsible and liable to disciplinary actions, irrespective of whether he/she has signed the declaration and whether he/she has contributed, directly or indirectly, to the problematic contents.
  • For assignments in the form of a computer-generated document that is principally text-based and submitted via VeriGuide, the statement, in the form of a receipt, will be issued by the system upon students’ uploading of the soft copy of the assignment.

Assignments without the properly signed declaration will not be graded by teachers.

Only the final version of the assignment should be submitted via VeriGuide.

The submission of a piece of work, or a part of a piece of work, for more than one purpose (e.g. to satisfy the requirements in two different courses) without declaration to this effect shall be regarded as having committed undeclared multiple submissions. It is common and acceptable to reuse a turn of phrase or a sentence or two from one’s own work; but wholesale reuse is problematic. In any case, agreement from the course teacher(s) concerned should be obtained prior to the submission of the piece of work.

Back to top