Evaluation (Quantitative)

Capacity Building Programme > Training for Nurses > Evaluation (Quantitative)

Depending on the content and delivery modalities, various kinds of questionnaires were administered to the nurse participants to gauge the effectiveness of the training sessions. More specifically, participants responded to Likert-type items and indicated the perceived extent to which they had benefited from the training in accordance with the knowledge-attitude-behavior framework, as well as rated their level of satisfaction with the sessions. Results show that, in general, participants had improved knowledge and skills, and became more confident and motivated to initiate and conduct end-of-life conversations.

The following tables depict some of the evaluation results obtained from the second and third phases of the project.

Quantitative Evaluation Results of Training for Nurses (Phase 2)

DomainItemNMSD
KnowledgeIncrease knowledge of EoL care
Raise awareness of EoL care
Improve skills in communicating with EoL patients and their family members
2,073
2,054
2,005
4.09
4.12
4.08
0.57
0.57
0.57
AttitudeImprove confidence in communicating with EoL patients and their family members
Increase motivation to initiate EoL conversations
2,025
2,007
4.06
4.00
0.56
0.60
BehaviorInitiate more EoL conversations2,0074.000.59
SatisfactionThe training is relevant
The training is important
The training is useful
The quality of the training is good
2,088
2,089
2,088
2,082
4.09
4.09
4.07
4.12
0.61
0.59
0.61
0.55

Quantitative Evaluation Results of Training for Nurses (Tentative Figures for Phase 3)

DomainItemNMSD
KnowledgeIncrease knowledge of EoL care
Raise awareness of EoL care
Improve skills in communicating with EoL patients and their family members
305
305
145
4.17
4.13
4.15
0.66
0.74
0.64
AttitudeImprove confidence in communicating with EoL patients and their family members
Increase motivation to initiate EoL conversations
145
145
4.02
4.00
0.65
0.65
BehaviorInitiate more EoL conversations1454.000.59
SatisfactionThe training is relevant
The training is important
The training is useful
The quality of the training is good
305
305
305
305
4.13
4.13
4.11
4.19
0.67
0.67
0.73
0.63
Note. Participants rated the extent to which they agreed with each of the above items (1 = Strongly Disagree, 5 = Strongly Agree). Results are aggregated, whenever applicable, across all training sessions. N = sample size; M = mean; SD = standard deviation; EoL = end-of-life.