|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ae38b/ae38b6d20c6ee79cbedc914710c0b01faeac2eea" alt="" |
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ae38b/ae38b6d20c6ee79cbedc914710c0b01faeac2eea" alt="" |
|
Reducing the subjectivity in grading written assignments |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/79b2e/79b2ea4bd6af97b9ae0dff05056fc21bf02a945d" alt="" |
Facilitator: |
Professor David Kember, Centre for Learning Enhancement And Research
|
Detail: |
Students
will not learn to write well unless they have to do written assignments.
However, marking of written assignments can lead to complaints of
subjectivity. This seminar introduces three criterion-based schemes
as examples of how to reduce subjectivity.
A checklist for assessing the quality of presentations.
A taxonomy for grading essays according to the quality of the structure.
A scheme for assessing written work in terms of the inherent level of reflective thinking.
|
Date: |
8
March 07, Thursday
|
Time: |
12:30pm - 1:30pm |
Venue: |
Room
803, William M.W. Mong Engineering Building
|
|
|
|
|