FEEDBACKS

 

 

Number of feedbacks / participants

Excellent

Good

Average

Poor

Choice of topics

16

22

6

0

Relevance to your work

12

16

15

1

Technical paper quality

7

30

7

0

Overall quality of presentations

9

25

9

1

Plenary speakers

17

21

5

0

Visuals

16

23

4

1

Overall effectiveness of speakers

7

28

8

0

Opportunities for interaction

17

20

7

0

Conference registration services:-

 

Pre-registration

21

18

6

0

On-site registration / check-in

19

18

5

0

Meeting room facility

13

25

5

1

Meals function 

(including coffee breaks)

24

13

7

0

Others:-

 

Banquet

2

 

 

 

Scheduling

 

 

 

1

Attendance:-

 

First time

32

Last year

6

Previous year(s)

5

Role:-

 

Speaker

22

Organizer/Committee member

6

Affiliation:-

 

University

28

Corporation

15

Government

2

Will you or an associate attend this conference next time?

 

 

Yes

33

No

6

Would you recommend this conference to a colleague?

 

Yes 

39

No

2

 

 

What did you expect to learn at this meeting? Were your expectations met?

Some new ideas. Yes

I really got what I need to know

What a conference is like. Yes.

Various methods regarding the dependability method and testing methods of safety-critical software. Yes, mostly.

Learn something about an area mainly new to me. Yes.

Latest in reliability method and web/software systems. I am fairly satisfied.

Which aspects does Software Reliability include? How to test them? 

Expected to learn new technologies in the area of verification. Expectation purely met. 

I wanted to learn about the topic from the software side and found the conference very interesting.

New ideas, approaches and techniques.

Expect to see others in this field. 

Yes. Progress in Component Software Reliability Assessment 

What is going on in the area of Software Reliability! 

Unexpected to get a good overview of our current "state of the art". My expectations were met.

What results in SRE theory and application to new types of software. Expectations met. 

New trends. Yes.

Know better the software reliability engineering community. Yes. 

I am expecting both theoretical and practical advances in software testing. 

Was expecting more of Industrial contribution. Yes, partially met.

Current research in testing. Yes.

Expectations were very well met.

 

 

Other comments and suggestions

Best set of plenary / keynote speakers at any conference I have attended over 20 years.

Need much longer coffee breaks. Key value of conference is personal contacts & discussions.

Afternoon sessions were rushed because lunch lasteed only one hour. Lunch should be 1.5 hours

It was a good idea to eliminate Tools Fair - we don't have critical mass to make it work well.

Not enough indication that the tutorials were held at different location from the main conference venue.

There are many concurrent sessions on testing, making attendees interested in testing cannot attend full parts of presentations on testing.

Some presentations in the same session are loosely related.

The organizers did a wonderful job. The best conferences I have attended in the past 5 years are ISSRE2001 and ISSRE 2000.

Technical staff did a wonderful job arranging the presentation equipment. The conference was smooth and comfortable throughout the week. 

Hotel was great, especially for the price. The service is as good as I have ever seen. 

Session chairs did a good job in time control.

Review and comments on the submitted paper are professional and excellent. However, the presentation files should also be reviewed to guarantee the quality of presentations.