Volume 124, Issue 7 p. 3871-3888
Research Article
Free Access

Preliminary Evaluation of the Atmospheric Infrared Sounder Water Vapor Over China Against High-Resolution Radiosonde Measurements

Zhaoliang Zeng,

Chinese Antarctic Center of Surveying and Mapping, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China

Search for more papers by this author
Feiyue Mao,

School of Remote Sensing and Information Engineering, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China

State Key Laboratory of Information Engineering in Surveying, Mapping and Remote Sensing, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China

Search for more papers by this author
Zemin Wang,

Corresponding Author

Chinese Antarctic Center of Surveying and Mapping, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China

Correspondence to: Z. Wang and J. Guo,

zmwang@whu.edu.cn;

jpguocams@gmail.com

Search for more papers by this author
Jianping Guo,

Corresponding Author

State Key Laboratory of Severe Weather, Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences, Beijing, China

Correspondence to: Z. Wang and J. Guo,

zmwang@whu.edu.cn;

jpguocams@gmail.com

Search for more papers by this author
Ke Gui,

Institute of Atmospheric Composition, Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences, CAM, Beijing, China

Search for more papers by this author
Jiachun An,

Chinese Antarctic Center of Surveying and Mapping, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China

UPC-IonSat, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain

Search for more papers by this author
Steve Hung Lam Yim,

Department of Geography and Resource Management, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China

Institute of Environment, Energy and Sustainability, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China

Stanley Ho Big Data Decision Analytics Research Centre, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China

Search for more papers by this author
Yuanjian Yang,

Institute of Environment, Energy and Sustainability, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China

State Key Laboratory of Loess and Quaternary Geology, Institute of Earth Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xi'an, China

Search for more papers by this author
Baojun Zhang,

State Key Laboratory of Severe Weather, Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences, Beijing, China

Search for more papers by this author
Hu Jiang,

Chinese Antarctic Center of Surveying and Mapping, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 21 March 2019
Citations: 8

Abstract

The accuracy of the Atmospheric Infrared Sounder (AIRS) water vapor product in China is as yet unknown due to the lack of collocated in situ sounding observations. Based on high-resolution soundings at 1400 Beijing time from 113 radiosonde sites across China, along with the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) and the Global Positioning System (GPS) data sets, a preliminary assessment has been conducted of AIRS water vapor mixing ratio (q) and precipitable water vapor (PWV) products in June 2013 and June 2014. Comparison between AIRS and radiosonde data suggests that the correlation coefficient (R) and mean bias of these two q products in China exhibit a distinct geographical dependence (with the highest R values in northwest China). This suggests that the AIRS q product tends to be underestimated in southeast China where cloud cover prevails, but overestimated in northwest China where cloud cover is sparse. With regard to the height-resolved distribution, the q products from both AIRS and radiosondes tend to decrease with increasing altitude, irrespective of the particular region. The spatial distribution of AIRS PWV is consistent with that from radiosonde-derived PWV, except in south China where the AIRS PWV data set is considerably underestimated. The accuracy of the AIRS water vapor product tends to be impaired under highly cloudy conditions, corroborating the notion of clouds affecting the retrieval of AIRS PWV. Our findings highlight the importance of afternoon sounding measurements in validating AIRS data and call for the improved understanding of the role of water vapor in the context of global climate change.

1 Introduction

Water vapor is an abundant greenhouse gas, playing an important role in the global water and energy cycle (Houghton et al., 1997; Trenberth et al., 2005). Moreover, the occurrence and development of extreme weather events, such as flash floods and droughts, are closely related to the spatial and temporal distribution and transport of water vapor (Braun et al., 2002; Solomon et al., 2010). Water vapor parameters, including the precipitable water vapor (PWV), layered precipitable water, and profiles of water vapor mixing ratio, are significant input parameters in numerical weather prediction and climate studies (Marshall et al., 2006; Randel & Park, 2006; Solomon et al., 2010).

The Atmospheric Infrared Sounder (AIRS) is currently the world's most advanced high-spectral-resolution infrared-atmospheric-detection instrument aboard the Aqua satellite, delivering three-dimensional products of water vapor, temperature, humidity and cloud information (Aumann et al., 2003). While the AIRS products have been widely used for improving weather-prediction and climate-change studies (Chahine et al., 2006; Dee et al., 2011; Miyoshi & Kunii, 2012; Zhou et al., 2010), there are still some uncertainties in the retrieved AIRS temperature and moisture profiles due to numerous factors, such as the accuracy of first-guess profiles, atmospheric transmittance effects, and cloud-masking retrieval algorithms (Divakarla et al., 2006); hence, several studies have systematically assessed the temperature and water vapor products derived from the AIRS instrument (Divakarla et al., 2006; Fetzer et al., 2003, 2008; Gettelman et al., 2004; Roman et al., 2016; Tobin et al., 2006). Specifically, Gettelman et al. (2004) used aircraft-based observations to examine the AIRS atmospheric water vapor product, demonstrating good consistency except for the large values of standard deviation above 150 hPa. Over the tropical oceans, the water vapor and temperature products of the AIRS instrument have proven to be very accurate, whereas the accuracy over midlatitude land regions is relatively poor (Tobin et al., 2006). On the global scale, the AIRS water vapor and temperature products agree well with operational radiosonde measurements under clear-sky conditions (Divakarla et al., 2006), but data are limited to the times (i.e., 0000 and 1200 UTC), thus leading to temporal inconsistency between AIRS and radiosonde data in most regions. Notably, in regions with cloud contamination and overcast conditions, it is extremely challenging for the AIRS instrument to detect the atmosphere beneath clouds, resulting in greater retrieval errors under cloudy areas (Susskind et al., 2003, 2006). Moreover, the AIRS/Advanced Microwave Sounding Unit (AMSU) Level 2 (L2) and Level 3 (L3) products are no longer updated after the AMSU-A2 instrument failed on 24 September 2016, requiring users shift to the AIRS-only V6 product, which is almost as good as the AIRS/AMSU combined product, except under cloudy conditions (http://www-airs.jpl.nasa.gov/). Generally, it is imperative to perform an assessment of atmospheric water vapor products from the AIRS instrument, and, if possible, appropriate quality indicators and error corrections must be made prior to being used in numerical weather prediction and related studies (Botes et al., 2012; Susskind et al., 2006).

The atmospheric flow with rainfall over China is significantly influenced by the East Asian summer monsoon (Li et al., 2016; Lu et al., 2016; Yang, Wang, et al., 2018). At the same time, China has undergone rapid economic growth with unfavorable meteorological conditions in recent decades, which has led to large emissions of aerosol and carbon dioxide (J. P. Guo et al., 2011, 2016; Li et al., 2016; X. Y. Zhang et al., 2012; Yang, Wang, et al., 2018, Yang, Zheng, et al., 2018), and thus these in turn induces rapid increases in temperature and inevitably changes the atmospheric water vapor due to the regional water vapor feedback effects resulting from climatic changes (Pan et al., 2017; Takahashi et al., 2008). However, current water vapor research remains at the case study level in certain local regions of China, and verification work on the accuracy of AIRS parameter inversions over China is scarce (Gui et al., 2017; Y. Zhang et al., 2012). As mentioned above, while a global-scale validation of AIRS retrievals has been conducted by Divakarla et al. (2006), they considered more samples in Europe and on the west coast of the United States than over China. That the traditional observational time of radiosondes at 0800 and 2000 Beijing time (BJT) do not match the AIRS overpass time is one of the major reasons further restricting verification over China (Zhang et al., 2016). In 2011, a land-based radiosonde network across China was successfully deployed by the China Meteorological Administration (Zhang et al., 2018). Depending on the special weather conditions or test requirements (J. Guo et al., 2016), irregularly dense observations have been performed in summer within this network at 1400 BJT, which is close to the Aqua overpass time, giving us a unique opportunity to accurately evaluate the AIRS water vapor product in China.

The aims here are to conduct a preliminary evaluation and analysis of AIRS water vapor mixing ratio (q) and the PWV products over China using dense radiosonde observations and correlation analyses between the AIRS and radiosonde-derived PWV, by considering the potential impact of the cloud fraction (CF). Below, section 2 describes the data sets from the radiosondes, the AIRS instrument, the Global Positioning System (GPS), and the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS), and section 3 introduces the matching and comparison methodology and basic statistics. Section 4 gives the results of horizontal and vertical comparisons of the AIRS and radiosonde q and PWV products, and the effect of the CF on the accuracy of AIRS PWV, while section 5 concludes this study with a summary.

2 Data Set

2.1 Radiosonde Data

The high-resolution radiosonde data of this study are from the China L-band second-level observational basic data set (version 1.0) of the China National Meteorological Administration's National Information Centre. The humidity and temperature from the radiosonde instruments have been updated from the 59-type radiosonde device to an electronic radiosonde device, and the detector test element has been replaced by a wet-resistance approach. Large-scale modernization was mainly carried out from 2005–2007 to the end of 2010, 120 operational radiosonde stations in China were updated to the L-band radar-electronic sounding systems. The L-band sounding radar is a new generation of secondary wind-measuring radars, which are fully automated in China and are synchronized with GTSl digital electronic radiosondes to continuously and automatically measure pressure, temperature, humidity, wind speed, wind direction, and other meteorological elements. The sampling period is approximately 1.2 s (China Meteorological Administration, 2010). The accuracy of the radiosonde measurements shows that the L-band radiosonde has a significantly higher accuracy than the radiosonde Model 59. The GTS1 radiosonde temperature detection accuracy is comparable to the RS80 radiosonde, while the GTS relative humidity sensor has a significant dry bias compared to the RS80, especially under cloud conditions (Bian et al., 2011). In this case, we have manually eliminated these data during data processing (See Text S1 and Figure S2 in the supporting information, SI, for the details description and quality control of radiosonde data set).

In accordance with the rule for conventional upper-air meteorological observations, each station performs two conventional aerial surveys at 0800 and 2000 BJT per day, and additionally performs observations at 0200 and 1400 BJT depending on the special weather conditions or test requirements (J. Guo et al., 2016). Since 2011, more observations have been irregularly performed at 1400 BJT in summer during special weather conditions and depending on experimental needs. However, as only extended observations for the whole month were conducted in June 2013 and June 2014 according to statistics of the original database, we consider sounding observations only in these two months to validate the q and PWV products from the AIRS instrument.

To match the passing time of the Aqua satellite (around 1330 BJT), we use the sounding observations at 1400 BJT from 113 radiosonde sites (see the dots in Figure 1) in June 2013 and June 2014 to calculate the q and PWV and to evaluate the AIRS-based q and PWV products. For the convenience of discussion and according to their geographical location, elevation, and station density (Figure 1), the sounding data in the stations with good quality are simply divided into seven subregions (refer to Zhai and Eskridge, 1997): northeast China (12 sites), north China (17 sites), northwest China (24 sites), the Tibetan Plateau (13 sites), southwest China (14 sites), the Yangtze River Valley (17 sites), and south China (16 sites). In addition, detailed provincial administrative boundary and some special station names pointed in the below texts are identified in Figure S1 in the SI.

image
Geographic distribution of China Meteorological Administration radiosonde sites (dots) and four International GNSS Service ground-based Global Positioning System sites (solid squares) over China. The seven defined subregions in this study are northeast China (blue dots), north China (green dots), northwest China (red dots), the Tibetan plateau (cyan dots), southwest China (magenta dots), the Yangtze River valley (yellow dots), and south China (black dots). GNSS = Global Navigation Satellite System.

2.2 AIRS Data

The AIRS instrument aboard the Aqua satellite is the first high-spectral-resolution infrared sensor to provide the three-dimensional water vapor distribution of the atmosphere and can complement the limitations of other satellite observations (Aumann et al., 2003). The AIRS instrument is a cooled-grating spectrometer providing 2,378 infrared channels at wavelengths of 3.7–15.4 μm (3.74–4.61, 6.20–8.22, and 8.8–15.4 μm) and four visible channels at wavelengths of 0.4–0.94 μm, with a spectral resolving power of 1,200 (Aumann et al., 2003; Parkinson, 2003). As the Humidity Sounder for Brazil (HSB) failed after a short period in February 2003, data from the combined AIRS and AMSU instruments are used, namely, the AIRS/AMSU product (Lambrigtsen, 2003), which has been released and updated to version 6. However, power to the AMSU-A2 instrument on Aqua was lost on 24 September 2016, and attempts to restore it to normal operation were unsuccessful. Therefore, the version of AIRS+AMUS L2 and L3 products has not been updated after the AMSU-A2 instrument failure, but the AIRS-only version 6 products are almost as good as the combined AIRS+AMSU product, except under cloudy conditions (https://airs.jpl.nasa.gov/amsu_a2_anomaly). The AIRS-only L2 and L3 products are available for the full mission in addition to AIRS+AMSU products, and the detailed description of the AIRS product change is available online (https://disc.sci.gsfc.nasa.gov). Here, a comparison between AIRS L2, L3 products, and radiosondes observation (as the reference) are performed for the case study, which shows that AIRS L3 products have good consistence with radiosonde observations than AIRS L2 product (See Text S2 in the SI for the details description of the comparison results). In addition, the radiosondes usually have large drift distances at high levels, and their maximum distance can reach ~100 km (Figure 2), which is similar with the AIRS L3 resolution of 1° and is much greater than the AIRS L2 resolution of 50 km. Therefore, the AIRS (AIRS+AMSU and AIRS-only) L3 rather than L2 water vapor-retrieval products were used in our study, namely, the AIRS-only (AIRS + AMSU) q, and PWV products, which are version 6 and derived from L2 standard swath data with quality indicators of “best” or “good” (Olsen et al., 2013; Tian et al., 2013). The level 3 data with separate ascending (1330 BJT) and descending (0130 BJT) orbits are produced on a 1° × 1° latitude-longitude grid on daily, 8-day, and monthly resolution scales. The AIRS (AIRS+AMSU and AIRS-only) q retrievals at 1,000, 925, 850, 700, 600, 500, 400, 300, 250, and 200 hPa levels are used in the analysis. The data in June 2013 and June 2014 have been processed.

2.3 GPS Data

Here, the GPS PWV products from four International Global Navigation Satellite System Service (IGS) ground-based GPS sites (Beijing, Changchun, Shanghai, and Wuhan) were selected to compare with radiosonde PWV in June 2013 and June 2014. The twice-hourly (i.e., 0100, 0300, …, 2100, 2300 UTC) GPS PWV data set is available online (http://rda.ucar.edu/datasets/ds721.1/). The algorithms used to retrieve the GPS PWV are described in detail by Bevis et al. (1994), Wang et al. (2005), and Wang et al. (2007), and its product accuracy is roughly 1–2 mm. In order to minimize the impact of distance and elevation differences between GPS sites and sounding stations, we made the following matching criteria (Gui et al., 2017; Wang & Zhang, 2008): (1) the distance between the GPS and radiosonde stations is within 50 km; (2) the elevation difference between the GPS and radiosonde stations is within 100 m; (3) the PWV data derived from the GPS at 1300 and 1500 BJT are averaged to compare with the radiosonde data at 1400 BJT. On the basis of these conditions, the locations of the four GPS sites are shown in Figure 1, and Table 1 summarizes the locations, distances, and height differences of the selected GPS and radiosonde sites.

Table 1. Detailed Descriptions of the Locations of Selected GPS and Radiosonde Sites Used in This Study and Distance and Height Difference
GPS site Latitude (°) Longitude (°) Altitude (m) Radiosonde site ID Distance (km) ΔHeight (m)
Beijing 39.61 115.89 97.87 54511 36.19 64.87
Changchun 43.79 125.44 258.12 54161 37.56 19.12
Wuhan 30.53 114.36 39.72 57494 32.09 15.72
Shanghai 31.10 121.20 11.38 58362 17.03 48.62

2.4 MODIS Data

Given the low spatial resolution of AIRS products, the subgrid cloud features cannot be well resolved. In contrast, a matching MODIS cloud product, to some extent, indicates whether a cloud in an instantaneous AIRS field exists or not and, thus, the testing of AIRS cloud products and the improved verification are mainly based on the cloud-product information in the MODIS atmospheric products as the testing standard (Li et al., 2005). Therefore, the L3 MODIS-Aqua CF and cloud-top-pressure data of the daily average (MYD08_D3) global grid over China in June 2013 and June 2014 were used. The spatial resolution of the MYD08_D3 daily data is 1° × 1°.

3 Methods

3.1 Estimation of q and PWV From Radiosonde Data

While sounding data are generally regarded as the atmospheric truth when evaluating satellite data, the temperature and dew point temperature from the soundings must still undergo quality control. Here, the Chinese L-band second-order observation basic data set (version 1.0) has undergone the quality control described in Zhai and Eskridge (1997). The water vapor mixing ratio q and PWV are calculated by (Wong et al., 2015, see also Alduchov & Eskridge, 1996 and Zhai & Eskridge, 1997)
urn:x-wiley:2169897X:media:jgrd55371:jgrd55371-math-0001(1)
where e = RHes(T) and es are the vapor pressure and the saturation vapor pressure (Pa), respectively, RH is the relative humidity (%), p is the pressure (Pa), and the vertically integrated water vapor (mm),
urn:x-wiley:2169897X:media:jgrd55371:jgrd55371-math-0002(2)
where pi and pi + 1 are the pressure levels (Pa) and g (= 9.806 m/s2) is the acceleration due to gravity, from which PWV may be calculated between the pressure levels pi and pi + 1.

3.2 Matching and Comparison Methods

Intercomparison analyses conducted between satellite (grid scale) and ground-based measurements (point) remain challenging. Here, when using the sounding data to validate the AIRS product (For the convenience, AIRS-only and AMSU+AMSU products all abbreviated to AIRS products), the key issue is how the impacts of balloon drifts on the representativeness of sounding data match with the corresponding AIRS grid value. Therefore, we conducted several experiments to investigate how the drift varies at different heights induced by balloon transport in the troposphere, taking the maximum drift distances at 200, 500, and 850 hPa as examples. Figures 2a–2c shows the spatial distribution of the maximum horizontal balloon-drift distances at 200, 500, and 850 hPa, respectively. At 200 hPa, the maximum horizontal drift distances for most balloons is less than 70 km, while less than 25 and 10 km at 500 and 850 hPa, respectively. Figure 2d shows the corresponding frequency distribution of horizontal maximum drift distances, which are all less than 100 km, with distributions at 200, 500, and 850 hPa varying from 0–90, 2–25, and <10 km, respectively, and are less than the mean distance between adjacent two stations of 100–200 km, which can be considered as representative of sounding observations. In contrast, as the AIRS L3 data are also spatially averaged to a ≈110 km × 110 km grid, we suggest that the spatial representation of radiosonde water vapor and the corresponding water vapor at the AIRS L3 grid are similar. Therefore, for exact spatial-temporal matches, daily AIRS 1° × 1° products were bilinearly interpolated to match the locations (latitude and longitude) of sounding sites in the horizontal direction and to match the standard sounding profiles in the vertical direction at daytime (≈1330 BJT), following previous studies on satellite product validations (Chahine et al., 2006; Divakarla et al., 2006; Prasad & Singh, 2009).

image
The maximum horizontal drift distance distribution of radiosondes at (a) 200, (b) 500, (c) 850 hPa at 1400 Beijing time (BJT) in June 2013 and June 2014, and (d) the corresponding horizontal drift distance frequency distribution.

To make the comparisons at the same vertical layers, based on the AIRS standard layer definition, we further calculate the value of q from radiosondes at each standard pressure layer. Then, the applicability of the horizontal direction is derived from the correlation coefficient (R), root-mean-square error (RMSE), and the mean bias (MB) of the AIRS q and sounding q values. The values of R, RMSE, RMS percent difference (Tobin et al., 2006), and MB of q between the AIRS retrievals and radiosonde observations are estimated at every station and for each standard (AIRS) vertical layer and then averaged vertically at every site. Comparing the AIRS q profile with the radiosonde q profile illustrates the difference in the vertical direction. The average values of RMSE, RMS, and MB for each station on each isobaric surface over the seven subregions are calculated to characterize the overall situation of the q deviation between the AIRS data and the observed data in each region. Moreover, to examine its profile, water vapor in the layers from the surface to 200 hPa, surface to 700 hPa, 700 to 400 hPa, and 400 to 200 hPa are calculated.

3.3 Statistical Metrics

For assessment of the performance of the AIRS product, we used the four statistical metrics R, RMSE, MB, and RMS defined by equations 36, respectively (Shi et al., 2018; Wong et al., 2015),
urn:x-wiley:2169897X:media:jgrd55371:jgrd55371-math-0003(3)
urn:x-wiley:2169897X:media:jgrd55371:jgrd55371-math-0004(4)
urn:x-wiley:2169897X:media:jgrd55371:jgrd55371-math-0005(5)
urn:x-wiley:2169897X:media:jgrd55371:jgrd55371-math-0006(6)
where n represents the number of samples, xi indicates the value of x for sample i, that is, the radiosonde measurements (e.g., q, PWV), yi indicates the value of y for sample i, that is, the satellite-retrieved and GPS products (e.g., AIRS q, AIRS PWV, and GPS PWV), urn:x-wiley:2169897X:media:jgrd55371:jgrd55371-math-0007 denotes the average of xi, and urn:x-wiley:2169897X:media:jgrd55371:jgrd55371-math-0008 denotes the average of yi. The correlation coefficient R is used to reflect the degree of the linear relationship between two variables, the root-mean-square error RMSE quantifies the differences between two variables, and the mean bias MB and the RMS percent difference respectively indicate the absolute and relative degree of overestimation/underestimation of each variable.

4 Results and Discussion

To clearly identify the differences caused by the lack of AMSU microwave data, the AIRS + AMSU products is further validated while validating the AIRS-only products. Overall, it has been verified that the q and PWV precisions of the two retrievals are close, either using the AIRS + AMSU retrieval or the AIRS-only retrieval. Therefore, for convenience, AIRS-only q and PWV products comparison results were given detailed discussion and analysis in the later sections. For a summary of AIRS + AMSU products comparison results, please see Text S3, and the AIRS + AMSU products validation results are presented in Figures S6–S10; the difference between AIRS + AMSU PWV and AIRS-only PWV is also shown in Figure S10.

4.1 Horizontal Comparisons Between AIRS q and Radiosonde q

The correlation coefficients between the AIRS q and radiosonde q products are first calculated at each AIRS standard vertical layer for each site and then averaged vertically at every site. Figure 3 shows the geographical distributions of vertically averaged R values between the radiosonde and AIRS q products at 1400 BJT in June 2013 and June 2014. Among the 113 stations, 79 stations have R > 0.6, indicating that the AIRS satellite retrieval data and radiosonde observations have high correlations at these sites, whereas 33 stations have 0.45 < R < 0.6, indicating that both data sets are moderately correlated at these sites. In addition, only one site has a small R value (0.39), but the site still passes the 95% confidence test. The R distribution of the two kinds of q data sets in China shows a clear geographical difference as follows: the R value is relatively high with the maximum of 0.83 in northwest China and the Tibetan Plateau, followed by northeast China, north China and the Yangtze River Valley, with R values lowest in the southwest (including the Sichuan Basin, Yunnan) and south China, with an average value of approximately 0.57. Overall, most stations have high R values with an average value of 0.64, which indicates that the AIRS q data and the radiosonde q data are highly consistent.

image
Geographic distribution map concerning the correlation coefficient (R) between Atmospheric Infrared Sounder q and radiosonde q at 1400 Beijing time in June 2013 and June 2014.

As a correlation analysis verifies the consistency between the AIRS q and radiosonde q products without indicating any absolute differences, the metrics MB and RMSE can be used to characterize the deviation between satellite-retrieved data and radiosonde observations. Figure 4 shows the RMSE and MB values (AIRS—radiosondes) at each ground station, with the sizes and colors of the circles representing RMSE and MB values, respectively. The RMSE value shows a decreasing trend from southeast to northwest China. For seven regions, the largest RMSE value is mainly located in south China (≈1.51 g/kg), followed by the Yangtze River Valley (1.49 g/kg), and the southwest regions (1.21 g/kg), with smaller RMSE values appearing in north China (0.93 g/kg), northeast China (0.84 g/kg), northwest China (0.71 g/kg), and the Tibetan Plateau (0.63 g/kg). For each single station, the maximum (minimum) RMSE value ≈1.72 g/kg (0.37 g/kg) occurs in the Xisha (Beitashan) station (See Figure S1 in SI). The overall RMSE value over China is small. Sixty stations, which account for 53% of the total number of stations, have RMSE < 1 g/kg. The spatial differences of the MB values of the two data sets are evident over China, which are all negative in the southern of the Yangtze River, and nearly negative to the northeastern of the Yangtze River, the eastern coastal areas, and northeast China, with positive values in northwest China and the Tibetan Plateau (except for two sites). The largest negative value is −0.89 in Ganzhou station, Jiangxi Province (see Figure S1 in SI), whereas the largest positive value is 0.76 in the Jing River station, Shaanxi Province (see Figure S1 in SI). The MB value is negative in 52% of the sites, which indicates that the AIRS q values are lower than the radiosonde q data. However, that the AIRS q products overestimate the value of q when the water vapor content is low explains the difference in our results (see Qin et al., 2012). The absolute value of MB for 93 stations is within 0.5, which is 82% of the total number of stations and indicates that the deviation between the two data sets in China is small. The CF values indicate the fraction of a pixel covered by the cloud. Interestingly, Figures 3, 4, and 5a show that the areas with large differences of water vapor content correspond to the high-cloud-coverage zones. As the cloud fraction decreases from south to north, the errors of AIRS q data are relatively larger in the south due to the low retrieval accuracy of AIRS q, which is mainly influenced by high CF in these areas (refer to Susskind et al., 2003, 2006).

image
Spatial distributions of root-mean-square error and mean bias of q from the Atmospheric Infrared Sounder compared with the radiosonde observations at 1400 BJT in June 2013 and June 2014. The circle size represents root-mean-square error values, and the shading color denotes relative bias value of q.
image
Spatial distributions of the mean cloud fraction (a) and cloud top pressure (b) at 1400 BJT in June 2013 and June 2014.

4.2 Vertical Comparisons Between AIRS q and Radiosonde q Products

Vertical profiles of water vapor mixing ratio derived from the AIRS and radiosonde observations directly reflect any vertical differences. The distribution of the average vertical profile of the AIRS q and radiosonde q at 1400 BJT in June 2013 and 2014 over seven subregions are shown in Figure 6. Due to the topography and altitude, the northwest and southwest China do not give consistent results below 1,000 hPa. The Tibetan Plateau has high altitudes (≈700 hPa) and no data below 700 hPa. Figure 6 shows that both the AIRS and radiosonde-derived q in the different regions of China decrease with increasing height. From 500 to 200 hPa, the vertical distributions of the two data sets in the seven regions are the same, and less than 4 g/kg, which indicates a high degree of coincidence. Below 500 hPa, especially at low levels, the differences between the two data sets are larger. South China, the Tibetan Plateau, and southwest China have relatively large deviations in the lower layers, which are mainly related to the elevation of the plateau, the topography of southwest China, and the abundant water vapor in south China (Zhai & Eskridge, 1997). The interpolation techniques within the subregions at different sites can also cause certain deviations. From 500 to 200 hPa, we find that the AIRS q values over the Tibetan Plateau and northwest China are higher than the radiosonde q values, whereas that of the other five regions are lower than radiosonde q values. Different areas have varying vertical profiles of q, with q values in the lower troposphere in south (northwest) China the largest (smallest). The corresponding q values for the AIRS and radiosonde observations at 1,000 hPa are 18.6 g/kg (8.53 g/kg) in south China and 17.8 g/kg (10.04 g/kg) in northwest China, respectively. For the Tibetan Plateau, the two kinds of q data at 700 hPa correspond to values of 6.02 and 4.84 g/kg. Below the height of 850 hPa, the AIRS q values are generally larger than the radiosonde q values across almost all regions, except for over northwest China. The satellite-retrieved data may be affected by the near-surface complexity below 850 hPa altitude (Zhao et al., 2012). The vertical profiles of AIRS and radiosonde q values show good consistency with the changes in height, with all reasonably reflective of the variation characteristics of q with decreasing height over the seven subregions.

image
Vertical profiles of AIRS q (in blue) and radiosonde q (in red) at 1400 BJT in June 2013 and June 2014 over the (a–g) seven subregions. AIRS = Atmospheric Infrared Sounder.

Figure 7 illustrates the magnitudes of RMSE, RMS, and MB of the AIRS and radiosonde q data sets for the seven subregions. The RMSE values have a decreasing trend with increasing height (Figure 7a). Above 400 hPa, the RMSE values of the seven areas are within 1 g/kg. Apart from the fact that the upper atmosphere is not affected by near-surface influences, the value of q in the upper atmosphere is considerably smaller than that in the lower layers. The vertical distribution of RMSE values of q in south China and the Yangtze River Valley are similar, where the RMSE values corresponding to each layer are largest relative to the other subregions (3.67 and 3.4 g/kg), appearing at the height of 850 hPa. The RMSE values at each altitude in southwest China are also larger than those in other subregions, with a maximum value of 3.03 g/kg at 700 hPa. The vertical distributions of RMSE values in north, northeast, and northwest China are similar, with the RMSE reaching maximum values (2.54, 2.38, and 1.7 g/kg) at 925, 1,000, and 850 hPa, respectively. Figure 7b shows that, at 1000–250 hPa, RMS percent differences range from 20 to 50%, and all increasing with height. Above 250 hPa, the RMS values in each region are relatively large, with the maximum value (more than 80%) found in the Northwest China. Maybe it is related to radiosonde data scarcity and poor quality of radiosonde humidity data in the upper troposphere. Figure 6c shows that, above 700 hPa, the mean biases of the seven regions differ significantly. Above 400 hPa, all MB values decrease to nearly zero with increasing height. For 1,000–700 hPa, the maximum absolute MB values are found in the lower troposphere over south China, the Yangtze River Valley, north China, and northeast China, with the maximum MB value of −2.56 g/kg over south China. According to previous studies (Divakarla et al., 2006; Susskind et al., 2003, 2006; Tobin et al., 2006), the retrieval errors of q profiles are mainly induced by the cloud height, which can be directly represented by the cloud top pressure related to the magnitude of the cloud top height (Figure 5b). By comparison of Figures 5b and 7, we find that the larger vertical MB values are mainly located at the existing cloud heights or below for most regions, where the cloud top pressures are >500 hPa (Figure 5b). Therefore, we deduce that the AIRS q errors at the lower to middle layers are mainly caused by vertically distributed clouds.

image
Vertical profiles of (a) RMSE, (b) RMS percent difference, and (c) mean bias between AIRS q and radiosonde q of all stations over the seven subregions at 1400 BJT in June 2013 and June 2014. RMSE = root-mean-square error; AIRS = Atmospheric Infrared Sounder; MB = mean bias.

In general, the above results suggest that the cloud fraction and cloud height are the main causes of the horizontal and vertical differences of AIRS q and radiosonde q values in the summertime (June) over China. That the accuracy of the AIRS q product is mainly affected by clouds is because clouds have a significant effect on the observed infrared radiances used in the temperature and moisture profile retrievals, with smaller effects on channel noise (Aumann et al., 2003; Rosenkranz, 2001). However, we suspect that the quality-controlled and revised sounding observations can correct inversion errors caused by the clouds to a certain extent, which is worth exploring in future work. Note that, in the upper troposphere, the GTS1 humidity data are (possibly) of poor quality and cannot pass quality control that may be related to low-temperature environment and humidity slants dry, which may be contributing to the large differences of horizontal and vertical above 300 hPa (e.g., RMS).

4.3 Intercomparison Between AIRS PWV and Radiosonde PWV Products

The PWV is the total atmospheric water vapor contained in a vertical column per cross-sectional unit (Ichoku et al., 2002; King et al., 1992; Shi et al., 2018). To perform a reliable comparison between the radiosonde and AIRS PWV products, radiosonde PWV data are first assessed using ground GPS data, which typically share similar techniques and can also successfully retrieve the PWV. The comparison of ground-based GPS PWV with radiosonde PWV is presented in Figure 8 at 1400 BJT for Beijing, Changchun, Shanghai, and Wuhan. The GPS PWV and radiosonde PWV at the four stations show excellent agreement, which is consistent with previous results (Gui et al., 2017), with R values of 0.95, 0.9, 0.98, and 0.98 for the Beijing, Changchun, Shanghai, and Wuhan sites, respectively. Moreover, the mean MB and RMSE values of the four stations are 1.77 and 3.97 mm, respectively. With the exception of the MB value of the Changchun station (−0.83 mm), the MB values of all stations indicate that the GPS PWV is slightly higher than the radiosonde PWV because of the difference in the length of the data used, the available PWV data at each station, and the different detection techniques adopted (Jiang et al., 2016).

image
Scatterplots for PWV from GPS and radiosondes at 1400 BJT in June 2013 and June 2014 at the following four sites: (a) Beijing, (b) Changchun, (c) Shanghai, and (d) Wuhan. PWV = precipitable water vapor; GPS = Global Positioning System.

The spatial distributions of the AIRS-derived mean PWV and radiosonde PWV (dots) are shown in Figure 9. The radiosonde PWV in June shows a gradual decline in magnitude from the southeast coast to the northwest inland, reaching maximum values of 57 mm in south China. The second largest value appears in the Yangtze River Valley and the Sichuan Basin, where the PWV is approximately 45 mm. The PWV in Xinjiang and Inner Mongolia is below 25 mm, and the PWV in the Tibetan Plateau is the lowest (below 10 mm). The variation in PWV is mainly associated with temperature and the source of water vapor, which is consistent with previous research by Zhai and Eskridge (1997). The limited amount of radiosonde stations cannot represent the spatial distribution of PWV over all of China, so the spatial variation of PWV derived from the AIRS data set is given. A large difference of the averaged radiosonde PWV at 1400 BJT is well captured by the AIRS PWV. The PWV obtained by the two detection techniques give a consistent spatial distribution, but the AIRS PWV tends to underestimate the PWV when considering the radiosondes as a reference, especially in south China.

image
Spatial distributions of the mean precipitable water vapor measured from Atmospheric Infrared Sounder (color shading) and radiosondes (color dots) at 1400 Beijing time in June 2013 and June 2014 over China.

To further quantify the differences between the two types of data, the scatterplots of AIRS PWV and radiosonde PWV in China and its seven subregions have been plotted in Figure 10, illustrating excellent consistence, with the R, RMSE, and MB values of 0.91, 7.68, and −2.79, respectively. For the seven subregions, except for south China, the correlations for north China, northwest China, northeast China, the Tibetan Plateau, the Yangtze River Valley, northeast China and southwest China are all significant, with R values of 0.89, 0.82, 0.8, 0.76, 0.74, and 0.68, respectively. The corresponding MB values are −0.06, −0.05, −2.04, −4.49, −1.99, and −5.7, and RMSE values of 4.63, 4.16, 4.23, 10.43, 5.16, and 9.92, respectively. The AIRS PWV tends to be systematically lower than the radiosonde PWV, and the difference between the two kinds of PWV also increases when the PWV is large. However, generally, the scatterplots of radiosonde PWV and AIRS PWV demonstrate a close correspondence, which gives confidence that AIRS PWV product can be used as an alternative when the radiosondes are unavailable.

image
Scatterplots of AIRS PWV and radiosonde PWV over northeast China (a), north China (b), northwest China (c), Tibetan Plateau (d), southwest China (e), Yangtze River Valley (f), south China (g), and whole China (h) at 1400 BJT in June 2013 and June 2014. AIRS = Atmospheric Infrared Sounder; PWV = precipitable water vapor; RMSE = root-mean-square error; MB = mean bias.

The PWV can explain the overall horizontal distribution of water vapor, but give no vertical information. To further study the vertical distribution of water vapor content over China, and compare the AIRS layer data with radiosonde data at different altitudes, we calculate the water vapor content in the following four layers: surface to 200 hPa, surface to 700 hPa, 700 to 400 hPa, and 400 to 200 hPa, representing the whole, lower, middle, and upper troposphere, respectively (Zhai & Eskridge, 1997). We focus on the radiosonde data, whereas the AIRS data are used for comparison. Figure 11 describes the spatial distributions of the mean of layered water vapor (LWV) for the (a) whole troposphere, (b) lower troposphere, (c) middle troposphere, and (d) upper troposphere from AIRS and radiosonde (dots) data at 1400 BJT in June 2013 and June 2014. The radiosonde LWV illustrated in Figure 11 shows that approximately two thirds (66%) of the water vapor content is stored in the lower troposphere. The water vapor rapidly decreases with increasing altitude, and the upper troposphere has less than 5% of the total water vapor content in the whole troposphere. For the Tibetan Plateau, the layer from the surface (average at 649.5 hPa) to 400 hPa is thinner than that in the other regions (Zhang et al., 2013), and this layer contains approximately 84% of the total water vapor content. Moreover, the maximum and minimum zones at the lower, middle, and upper layers do not exactly match vertically. The differences of water vapor content between the AIRS and radiosonde data are mainly observed in the lower troposphere, where the largest differences are at Guangdong, Guangxi, and Fujian Province (see Figure S1 in SI), followed by northeast China, the Yangtze River Valley and the Sichuan Basin; the differences in the other regions are relatively small. In the middle troposphere, the areas with clear differences are mainly distributed in the Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau and the Sichuan Basin. In the upper troposphere, the spatial distribution of the water vapor content between the AIRS data and radiosonde data is relatively consistent, and the difference is negligible, which is related to the fact that the upper troposphere is not affected by the near-surface layer and considerably lower levels of high LWV.

image
The spatial distributions of the mean of PWV from AIRS (color shading) and radiosondes (color dots) at 1400 BJT in June 2013 and June 2014 for (a) Surface 200 hPa, (b) Surface 700 hPa, (c) 700–400 hPa and (d) 400–200 hPa. AIRS = Atmospheric Infrared Sounder; PWV = precipitable water vapor.

4.4 Impact of Cloud Fraction on the AIRS PWV

As cloud contamination often leads to uncertainty or artifacts in the satellite inversions (Foster et al., 2006), to examine the effect of the CF on the correlation between the AIRS PWV and radiosonde PWV, the seven subregions are further analyzed by obtaining the CF through MODIS CF data, matched with the corresponding AIRS PWV timestamp and sorted by the CF value in ascending order. The samples that correspond to the smallest (largest) one third of the cloud value have been classified as low–(high–) cloud cover conditions, and the others as partly cloudy conditions. Table 2 presents the statistical information of three bins for the CF containing the value range and mean CF for each bin in each area. The mean CF values of the low-cloud-cover conditions in southwest China, the Yangtze River Valley and south China exceed 0.4. The cloudiness in these areas is relatively high in summer, and the range of values of overcast conditions is above 0.9, which indicates that cloud cover increases in summer over China.

Table 2. Statistical Information of Cloud Fraction Distribution Over Seven Regions and the Whole China
Region First bin Second bin Third bin
Value range Mean CF Value range Mean CF Value range Mean CF
Northeast China ≤0.48 0.24 0.48–0.90 0.72 ≥0.90 0.98
North China ≤0.44 0.18 0.44–0.90 0.68 ≥0.90 0.98
Northwest China ≤0.24 0.09 0.24–0.70 0.45 ≥0.70 0.91
Tibetan Plateau ≤0.50 0.26 0.50–0.82 0.66 ≥0.82 0.94
Southwest China ≤0.86 0.48 0.86–0.99 0.95 ≥0.99 1.00
Yangtze River Valley ≤0.85 0.48 0.85–0.99 0.95 ≥0.99 1.00
South China ≤0.84 0.53 0.84–0.99 0.93 ≥0.99 1.00
Whole China ≤0.52 0.23 0.52–0.95 0.77 ≥0.95 0.99

The effect of the CF on the correlation between the AIRS PWV and radiosonde PWV is investigated by dividing the paired data into three equal-sample bins. Figure 12 shows that the value of R tends to decrease when all paired data are taken under highly cloudy conditions in China and the seven subregions, in comparison with that under low–cloud cover conditions. With the increase of CF, the R values are reduced by 13.75% (from 0.8 to 0.69), 9.89% (from 0.9 to 0.82), 19.54% (from 0.87 to 0.7), 22.62% (from 0.84 to 0.65), 30.67% (from 0.75 to 0.51), 42.7% (from 0.89 to 0.51), and 87.95% (from 0.83 to 0.12) for northeast China, north China, northwest China, the Tibetan Plateau, southwest China, the Yangtze River Valley, and south China, respectively, which indicates that the CF exerts a significant impact on the correlation between the AIRS PWV and radiosonde PWV. Moreover, RMSE values increase with the increase of CF, MB values vary from positive to negative (except those for the Tibetan Plateau, southwest China and south China), whereas the absolute values increase from relatively small to larger magnitudes. The CF considerably affects the accuracy of the AIRS PWV-retrieved products, with differences under overcast conditions significantly higher than those under low–cloud cover conditions. As the statistics for south China show that the accuracy of AIRS PWV is low because of the high cloudiness in summer, caution must be taken when using AIRS data in this region during the summer.

image
AIRS PWV plotted against radiosonde PWV under low–(in blue) and high–(in red) cloud cover conditions over (a) northeast China, (b) north China, (c) northwest China, (d) Tibetan Plateau, (e) southwest China, (f) Yangtze River Valley, (g) south China, and (h) whole China in June 2013 and June 2014. R* indicates that the correlation failed significance test (i.e., p > 0.05). AIRS = Atmospheric Infrared Sounder; PWV = precipitable water vapor; RMSE = root-mean-square error; MB = mean bias.

5 Concluding Remarks

The accuracy of AIRS products is far from well-known due to the lack of simultaneous soundings in the early afternoon. This study is the first to perform a preliminary assessment of the performance of AIRS troposphere water vapor products based on high-resolution radiosonde measurements at 1400 BJT over China. The analysis of the results reveals several interesting features.

The spatial distribution of the correlation coefficient R for the two q data sets in China suggest clear geographical differences as follows: over northwest China and the Tibetan Plateau, the values of R are relatively high, reaching a maximum of 0.83, but lowest in southwest and south China, with an average value of ≈0.57. The root-mean-square error RMSE shows a decreasing trend from the southeast to northwest China. The overall absolute value of mean bias MB is small (93 stations within 0.5) and suggests an underestimation in the south, overestimation in the north, and systematic overestimation of AIRS q values when the water vapor content is low. The vertical comparison suggests that the AIRS q and radiosonde q products show good consistency with the changes in elevation (terrain), and both can reasonably reflect the variational characteristics of q with a decreasing height over the seven subregions of China. The RMSE, MB, and RMS values show that, above 400 hPa, the RSME values of the seven areas are within 1 g/kg, the MB values of the seven areas are all near zero, and the RMS values of the seven areas are all within 50% (except for 250 hPa). Below 400 hPa, RMSE and MB values show that the AIRS q and sounding q data show a large degree of deviation in the lower troposphere and differences among regions.

In terms of the spatial pattern, the AIRS PWV products and radiosonde PWV exhibit good consistency, but the AIRS PWV tends to be underestimated in south China. The discrepancy between the two observations, mostly limited to the lower troposphere, is positively associated with the water vapor content. Finally, the impact of clouds on the intercomparison between the AIRS and radiosonde data is analyzed. Correlation analyses between the AIRS PWV and radiosonde PWV indicate that the value of R tends to be significantly lower when all paired data are taken under high cloudy conditions in China, as compared with that under partly cloudy and low–cloud cover conditions, respective of the subregions. In south China, the accuracy of AIRS PWV is extremely low because of the high cloudiness in summer, indicating that the quality control of AIRS PWV is necessary in this region.

In addition, note that there still are some biases in radiosonde data, especially under cloud conditions, even after a series of quality controls, bias correction and evaluations in the present work. These biases can possibly result in inaccurate vertical profile of radiosonde temperature and humidity, which may also incur uncertainties in validating the AIRS water vapor product. At least, our findings highlight the importance of validating AIRS data against simultaneous sounding observations, which has significant implications for the improved understanding of the role of water vapor in the context of global climate change.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under grants 41776195, 41531069, and 41775139, the Ministry of Science and Technology under grants 2017YFC1501701 and 2017YFA0603501, the CAMS under grant 2017Z005, the Li Jiancheng academician workstation under grant 2015IC015 and the open funding of State Key Laboratory of Loess and Quaternary Geology (SKLLQG1842). The radiosonde data used in this study were acquired from CMA. The authors thank the NASA team for providing the AIRS and MODIS data. All the data used are listed in the references or archived in the following repositories: https://disc.gsfc.nasa.gov/datasets, http://data.cma.cn/site/index.html, https://rda.ucar.edu/datasets/ds721.1/, and https://search.earthdata.nasa.gov/.