HIST5506D Special Topics in Comparative History: Human-Animal Relationship in History

This course examines the changing cultural and social positions of animals in the human world from ancient to present times. Adopting cross-cultural and comparative approaches, this course investigates the various and changing roles of animals in the long course of human history as totems, food, working companions, pets, etc. The changing human-animal relationship is a useful lens to understand not only the important role animals have played in human society, but also the changes in the ethical values of the humanity over time.

Learning Outcomes:

Students will be able to

1. identify the various forces and factors that have shaped the human-animal relationship in different periods of time.
2. analyze current controversial animal issues with a historical and comparative perspective.
3. synthesize  primary,  secondary,  written,  and visual sources  to make informed  interpretations  of historical and current issues about animals.

1. Introduction: Background and Issues

• Franklin, Adrian. “Good to Think with”: Theories of Human-animal  Relations in Modernity.” A Sociology of Human-animal Relations in Modernity (London: Sage Publication, 1990), pp. 9-33.
• Sterckx,  Roel  & Martina  Siebert  Dagmar  Schafer.  “Knowing  Animals  in China’s  History:  An Introduction.” In Roel Sterckx,  Martina Siebert & Dagmar Schafer eds., Animals Through Chinese History: Earliest Times to 1911 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018), pp. 1-19.

2. From Hunting to Domestication of Animals

• Bulliet, Richard W. Hunters, Herders, and Hamburgers: The Past and Future of Human-Animal Relationships (New York: Columbia University Press, 2005), pp. 71-100.
• Diamond, Jared. “The Anna Karenina Principle: Why were most big wild mammal species never domesticated?”  In  Guns,  Germs,  and  Steel:  The  Fates  of  Human  Societies  (London: Vintage, 1998), pp. 157-175.

3. Animals in Asian Religious Traditions

• Kemmerer, Lisa. Animals and World Religions (New York: Oxford University Press, 2011), pp. 4-18.
• Liu, Chungshee Hsien. “The Dog-Ancestor Story of the Aboriginal Tribes of Southern China.” The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, Vol. 62 (Jul. – Dec. 1932), pp. 361-368.
• Sterckx, Roel. “Animal to Edible: The Ritualization of Animals in Early China.” In Roel Sterckx, Martina Siebert & Dagmar Schafer eds., Animals Through Chinese History: Earliest Times to 1911 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018), pp. 46-63.

4. Animals in Western Religious Traditions

• Kemmerer,  Lisa. Animals and World religions (New York: Oxford University  Press, 2011), pp. 206-240.
• Demello,  Margo. Animals  and Society:  An Introduction  to Human-Animal  Studies  (New York: Columbia University Press, 2012), ch. 15, “Animals in Religion and Folklore,” pp. 301-324.

5. Animal Food Taboo (Tutorial 1, Oct. 5)

• *Goossaert,  Vincent.  “The  Beef  Taboo  and  the Sacrificial  Structure  of Late  Imperial  Chinese Society.” In Roel Sterckx ed, Of Tripod and Palate: Food, Politics, and Religion in Traditional China (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005), pp. 237-248.
• *Harris,  Marvin.  “Mother  Cow.”  In  Cows,  Pigs,  Wars  and  Witches:  The  Riddles  of  Culture (London: Hutchinson & Co., 1975), pp. 11–32.
• Poon, Shuk-wah. “Dogs and British Colonialism: The Contested Ban on Eating Dogs in Colonial Hong Kong.” Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth  History. (Volume 42, Issue 2, 2014), pp. 308-328.
• The Age of Reason and Modern Zoos
• *Cowie,    Helen. Exhibiting    Animals    in    Nineteenth-Century    Britain: Empathy,    Education, Entertainment (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014), pp. 101-125.
• *Demello, Margo. Animals and Society: An Introduction to Human-Animal  Studies (New York: Columbia University Press, 2012), ch. 6, “Display, Performance, and Sport,” pp. 99-125.

6. Animals, Science, and Epidemics

• Pepin, Jacques. The Origins of AIDS (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011), pp. 221-234.
• Torrey, E. Fuller & Robert H. Yolken. Beasts of the Earth: Animals, Humans, and Disease (New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 2005), pp. 112-123.

7. Pet-keeping Culture and the Rise of the Middle Class (Tutorial 2, Oct. 19)

• Ritvo, Harriet. “The Emergence of Modern Pet-keeping.” In Flynn, Clifton P. ed. Social Creatures: A Human and Animal Studies Reader (New York: Lantern Books, 2008), pp. 96-106.
• Serpell, James & Elizabeth Paul. “Pets and the Development of Positive Attitudes to Animals.” In Aubrey  Manning  &  James  Serpell  eds.  Animals  and  Human  Society:  Changing  Perspectives (London: Routledge, 1994), pp. 127-141.

8. Animals in the Age of Imperialism

• Mackenzie,   John.  The  Empire  of  Nature:   Hunting,   Conservation   and  British  Imperialism (Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press, 1988), pp. 225-260.
• Sramek, Joseph. ‘“Face Him Like a Briton”: Tiger Hunting, Imperialism, and British Masculinity in Colonial India, 1800-1875.’ Victorian Studies, vol. 48, no. 4 (2006), pp. 659-680.

9. The Emergence of Animal Protection Movements in the 19th Century

• Harrison, Brian. “Animals and the State in Nineteenth-Century  England.” The English Historical Review, Vol. 88, No. 349 (Oct., 1973), pp. 786-820.
• Kete, Kathleen. “Animals and Ideology: The Politics of Animal Protection in Europe.” In  Rothfels Nigel ed., Representing Animals (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2002), pp. 19-34.

10. Politics of Animal Protection in the 20th Century (Tutorial 3, Nov. 2)

• * Hirata, Keiko. “Beached Whales: Examining Japan’s Rejection of an International Norm,” Social Science Japan Journal, 7 (2004): 177–97.
• *  Andresen,  Steinar.  “Whaling:  Peace  at  Home,  War  Abroad.”  In  Jon  Birger  Skjærseth,  ed., International Regimes and Norway’s Environmental Policy: Crossfire and Coherence (Hampshire: Ashgate, 2004), pp. 41–65.
• Poon, Shuk-wah. “Buddhist Activism and Animal Protection in Republican China.” In Paul Katz and Stefania Travagnin, eds., Concepts and Methods for the Study of Chinese Religions III: Key Concepts in Practice (De Gruyter, Germany, 2019), pp. 91-111.

11. Animals as National Symbols (Tutorial 4, Nov. 16)

• *Nicholls,  Henry.  The  Way  of  the  Panda:  The  Curious  History  of  China’s  Political  Animal (London: Profile Books Ltd., 2010), pp. 38-75.
• *Skabelund, Aaron Herald. “The ‘Loyal Dog’ Hachiko and the Creation of the “Japanese” Dog.” In  Empire  of  Dogs:  Canines,  Japan,  and  the  Making  of  the  Modern  Imperial  World  (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2011), pp. 87-129.

12. Conclusion: “Why Look at Animals”

•     Berger, John. “Why Look at Animals.” In About Looking (New York: Pantheon Books, 1980), pp. 1-28.

請注意大學有關學術著作誠信的政策和規則，及適用於犯規事例的紀律指引和程序。詳情可瀏覽網址：http://www.cuhk.edu.hk/policy/academichonesty/。

學生遞交作業時，必須連同已簽署的聲明一併提交，表示他們知道有關政策、規則、指引及程序。

• 如屬小組習作，則所有組員均須簽署聲明；所有組員（不論有否簽署聲明及不論有否直接或間接撰寫有問題的內容）均須負上集體責任及受到懲處。
• 如作業以電腦製作、內容以文字為主，並經由大學「維誠」系統 (VeriGuide) 提交者，學生將作業的電子檔案上載到系統後，便會獲得收據，收據上已列明有關聲明。

未有夾附簽署妥當的聲明的作業，老師將不予批閱。

學生只須提交作業的最終版本。

學生將作業或作業的一部份用於超過一個用途（例如：同時符合兩科的要求）而沒有作出聲明會被視為未有聲明重覆使用作業。學生重覆使用其著作的措辭或某一、二句句子很常見，並可以接受，惟重覆使用全部內容則構成問題。在任何情況下，須先獲得相關老師同意方可提交作業。